Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 20, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/4/469    most recent
aeh088v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ngan Kee, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ngan Kee, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, F. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 4 469-474
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section{dagger}

W. D. Ngan Kee*, K. S. Khaw and F. F. Ng

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

*Corresponding author. E-mail: warwick@cuhk.edu.hk
{dagger}This article is accompanied by Editorial I.Presented as a poster at the Australian Society of Anaesthetists and the New Zealand Society of Anaesthetists Combined National Scientific Congress, Melbourne, Australia, October 2–5, 2003.

Background. During spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section, the optimal phenylephrine regimen and the optimal blood pressure (BP) to which it should be titrated are undetermined. The ideal regimen would balance efficacy for maintaining uteroplacental perfusion pressure against potential for uteroplacental vasoconstriction, both of which may affect fetal acid–base status. We compared phenylephrine infusion regimens based on three different BP thresholds.

Methods. After intrathecal injection, we infused phenylephrine 100 µg min–1 for 2 min. Then, until delivery, we infused phenylephrine whenever systolic BP (SBP), measured every 1 min, was below a randomly assigned percentage of baseline: 100% (Group 100, n=25), 90% (Group 90, n=25) or 80% (Group 80, n=24). We compared umbilical blood gases, Apgar scores and maternal haemodynamics and symptoms.

Results. Patients in Group 100 had fewer episodes [median 0 (range 0–8)] of hypotension (SBP <80% baseline) compared with Group 80 [5 (0–18)] and Group 90 [2 (0–7)] (P<0.001 in each instance). Total dose of phenylephrine was greater in Group 100 [median 1520 µg (interquartile range 1250–2130 µg)] compared with Group 90 [1070 (890–1360) µg] and Group 80 [790 (590–950) µg]. Umbilical arterial pH was greater in Group 100 [mean 7.32 (95% confidence interval 7.31–7.34)] than in Group 80 [7.30 (7.28–7.31)] (P=0.034). No patient had umbilical arterial pH <7.2. In Group 100, 1/24 (4%) patients had nausea or vomiting compared with 4/25 (16%) in Group 90 and 10/25 (40%) in Group 80 (P=0.006).

Conclusions. For optimal management, phenylephrine should be titrated to maintain maternal BP at near-baseline values.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 469–74


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. B. Sartain, J. J. Barry, P. W. Howat, D. I. McCormack, and M. Bryant
Intravenous oxytocin bolus of 2 units is superior to 5 units during elective Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2008; 101(6): 822 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, A. Lee, K. S. Khaw, F. F. Ng, M. K. Karmakar, and T. Gin
A Randomized Double-Blinded Comparison of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine Infusion Combinations to Maintain Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Fetal Acid-Base Status and Hemodynamic Control
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1295 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Balki, S. Kasodekar, S. Dhumne, and J. C. A. Carvalho
Prophylactic Granisetron Does Not Prevent Postdelivery Nausea and Vomiting During Elective Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 679 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Erkinaro, T. Kavasmaa, M. Pakkila, G. Acharya, K. Makikallio, S. Alahuhta, and J. Rasanen
Ephedrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension in a chronic sheep model of increased placental vascular resistance
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. G. M. Aya, N. Vialles, I. Tanoubi, R. Mangin, J.-M. Ferrer, C. Robert, J. Ripart, and J.-E. de La Coussaye
Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension: A Risk Comparison Between Patients with Severe Preeclampsia and Healthy Women Undergoing Preterm Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.