Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLACKBURN, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLACKBURN, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980, Vol. 52, No. 5 551-555
© 1980 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

EVALUATION OF THE DATEX CD-101 AND GODART CAPNOGRAPH MARK II INFRA-RED CARBON DIOXIDE ANALYSERS

J. P. BLACKBURN, F.F.A.R.C.S. and T. R. WILLIAMS, F.F.A.R.C.S.

Department of Clinical Measurement, Westminster Hospital London S.W.1.

Performance of the Datex CD-101 and Godart Capnograph Mark II infra-red carbon dioxide analysers was investigated. The Datex machine uses a solid-state infra-red detector, while the Godart instrument uses a Luft detector. Both instruments were easy to use and the small size and light weight of the Datex was an added convenience. Linearity, stability, response time and the effect of nitrous oxide were within specification in both machines except when 10% carbon dioxide was used with the Datex analyser. Linearity of the Godart instrument was considerably better than 1% full scale deflection (fsd) quoted in the specification, while the Datex analyser was within 2% fsd (4% fsd with 10% carbon dioxide).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. B. Jaffe
Infrared Measurement of Carbon Dioxide in the Human Breath: "Breathe-Through" Devices from Tyndall to the Present Day
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 890 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.